God isn't real. Death can be tricked. Is that good or bad?
Science has quarks and calls the different types of them flavors. Up, down, strange, charm, bottom, top. They are the little things you look for under microscopes and the little things I move when I change the shape of something.
Do you think you could figure out which one is evil?
You're referring to Gell-Mann's work. If I note down every professor of natural science whose lectures I managed to miss for irresponsible reasons, will you tell me which go on to win Nobel Prizes so I can kick myself appropriately?
I'm not properly qualified on the subject of evil.
To be honest this is about the best I get on with anyone to begin with. I live alone in the dungeons of a castle, you know.
[ stop it immediately both of you ]
Darkness is not inherently evil. Darkness is labeled as evil most of the time by idiots who think things like god and karma are real - and I'm sad to say they populate the wizarding world as anywhere else. A Dementor is a Dark creature born of ill-intent and whatever flavor of quark is the wrong one for souls but the right one for Dementor-making. But a hydra is called Dark also, despite it being a natural creature born of the earth like anything else.
There's a difference when you're up to your neck in it but I'm not sure what it'd be on paper.
Like I said: morality hasn't a place in scientific discovery either but it is no doubt put within such frameworks via the actions of man. If you know Gell-Mann and strangeness, you know of Hahn and nuclear fission.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Science has quarks and calls the different types of them flavors. Up, down, strange, charm, bottom, top. They are the little things you look for under microscopes and the little things I move when I change the shape of something.
Do you think you could figure out which one is evil?
no subject
You're referring to Gell-Mann's work. If I note down every professor of natural science whose lectures I managed to miss for irresponsible reasons, will you tell me which go on to win Nobel Prizes so I can kick myself appropriately?
I'm not properly qualified on the subject of evil.
no subject
I am. And you're right. It isn't real.
no subject
Good exists. Darkness is not only an opposite of light but an absence of it. That is an unscientific opinion for the record.
no subject
[ stop it immediately both of you ]
Darkness is not inherently evil. Darkness is labeled as evil most of the time by idiots who think things like god and karma are real - and I'm sad to say they populate the wizarding world as anywhere else. A Dementor is a Dark creature born of ill-intent and whatever flavor of quark is the wrong one for souls but the right one for Dementor-making. But a hydra is called Dark also, despite it being a natural creature born of the earth like anything else.
There's a difference when you're up to your neck in it but I'm not sure what it'd be on paper.
no subject
Like I said: morality hasn't a place in scientific discovery either but it is no doubt put within such frameworks via the actions of man. If you know Gell-Mann and strangeness, you know of Hahn and nuclear fission.
no subject
But also power plants.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject